February 1998
- OT: Following in the footsteps of JCL Alex Oren
- OT: Following in the footsteps of JCL Nathan Yospe
- OT: Following in the footsteps of JCL Richard Woolcock
- OT: Following in the footsteps of JCL Chris Gray
- OT: Following in the footsteps of JCL coder@ibm.net
- OT: Following in the footsteps of JCL Marc Eyrignoux
- Ada? Andrew C.M. McClintock
- Monthly FAQ posting Koster, Raph
- Monthly FAQ posting Adam Wiggins
- Monthly FAQ posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Chris Gray
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting J C Lawrence
- Monthly FAQ Posting J C Lawrence
- Monthly FAQ Posting Alex Oren
- Monthly FAQ Posting Greg Miller
- Monthly FAQ Posting s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling Lo
- Monthly FAQ Posting Koster, Raph
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling Lo
- Monthly FAQ Posting Greg Miller
- Monthly FAQ Posting Marian Griffith
- Monthly FAQ Posting Greg Miller
- Monthly FAQ Posting Ling Lo
- Databases Shawn Halpenny
- OT: This is a test coder@ibm.net
- OT: This is a test Alex Oren
- Clients and things [Was: OT: This is a test] Matt Chatterley
- Clients and things [Was: OT: This is a test] coder@ibm.net
- Clients and things [Was: OT: This is a test] Matt Chatterley
- MUD Development Digest Dr. Cat
- DBs and Events Greg Munt
- DBs and Events Nathan Yospe
- DBs and Events Greg Munt
- DBs and Events Nathan Yospe
- DBs and Events Felix A. Croes
- DBs and Events Jon A. Lambert
- DBs and Events coder@ibm.net
- DBs and Events s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
- DBs and Events Jon A. Lambert
- DBs and Events coder@ibm.net
- (subject missing) Ben Greear
- META: Unsubscribed users dur to bounces coder@ibm.net
- META: Unsubscribed users dur to bounces Adam Wiggins
- Source Code Release Greg Munt
- Source Code Release Ben Greear
- Source Code Release Greg Munt
- Source Code Release Ben Greear
- Source Code Release Greg Munt
- Source Code Release Richard Woolcock
- Source Code Release Ben Greear
- Source Code Release Chris Gray
- Source Code Release Greg Munt
- Source Code Release coder@ibm.net
- Source Code Release Richard Woolcock
- Source Code Release Stephen Zepp
- Source Code Release Jon A. Lambert
- Source Code Release Greg Munt
- Source Code Release Jon A. Lambert
- Source Code Release Greg Munt
- Source Code Release Travis Casey
- Source Code Release Jon A. Lambert
- Source Code Release Jon A. Lambert
- [RESEARCH]MUD articles archive (fwd) Greg Munt
- Socket programming (Was: The impact of the web on muds) Jon Leonard
- Socket programming (was: The impact of the web on muds) Vadim Tkachenko
- Socket programming (was: The impact of the web on muds) Richard Woolcock
- byte-code anyone? Chris Gray
- byte-code anyone? Jon Leonard
- byte-code anyone? Chris Gray
- byte-code anyone? Jon Leonard
- byte-code anyone? Chris Gray
- user-centered design (was Clients) Mike Sellers
- OT: Linux g++ Greg Munt
- OT: Linux g++ Ben Greear
- OT: Linux g++ coder@ibm.net
- OT: Linux g++ Shawn Halpenny
- OT: Linux g++ Chris Gray
- OT: Clients Vadim Tkachenko
- OT: Clients Adam Wiggins
- OT: Clients coder@ibm.net
- META: OS wars coder@ibm.net
- META: OS wars Mike Sellers
- Clients Stephen Zepp
- Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) Brandon J. Rickman
- Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) Adam Wiggins
- Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) Chris Gray
- Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) coder@ibm.net
- Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) Brandon J. Rickman
- Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) Mike Sellers
- Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) Chris Gray
- Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) Ben Greear
- Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) Ling
- Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) Brandon J. Rickman
- Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) coder@ibm.net
On 13/02/98 at 08:24 PM, "Brandon J. Rickman" <ashes@pc4.zennet.com> said:
>On Fri, 13 Feb 1998 16:24:56, Mike Sellers <mike@online-alchemy.com>
>wrote:
>>-- Moore's Law still rules. :)
>The tiresome Moore's Law rhetoric.
...deletia...
>The people that are actually
>using the fastest available machines are usually closely tied to the
>computer chip industry in the first place, like the chip designers using
>fast chips to design faster chips.
You'd be surprised here. How many SPARCS did Pixar use for ToyStory? ILM
uses?
The graphic arts industry is a huge consumer of fast CPU's (I believe we
have a few representantives on the list), as are the finacial and medical
interests. Computerised rendering and touch-up has hit the ad industry
hard. Many TV interests are investing heavily in automated real-time
video touch-up technologies. There are a *LOT* of poeple out there wallet
in hand looking for ever faster CPU's. Admittedly not as many as those
looking for a machine to run Quake (which I must actually get to see some
day), but not an insignificant few, or an insignificant sized wallet.
>On the plus side, as big business needlessly upgrades their machines the
>"obsolete" machines are falling into the hands of artists, educators, and
>non-first world citizens. This market is not reflected in Intel's sales
>reports and Intel has no idea what people may be doing with those
>machines.
Trickle down theory revisited. Yup, it works.
>Third, designing for non-existant technology is a dumb-assed design
>constraint.
To do what I want to do I'm going to need both a significantly faster CPU,
and a 300% increase in sustained DASD bandwidth. Yes, I can shuffle along
with waht is available now. Yes, its a mere shadow of what it should be.
>[Aside: there is the old argument that goes:
>If I start computing today it will take me three years to finish. If I
>start computing a year from now it will only take me one year (two years
>total).
>Therefore I should wait until next year.
If I do it with current hardware, it will be slow and largely unusable.
If I develop for what I think will be, I'll get something that's
performant and usable when the hardware finally arrives.
>Designing for an imaginary machine is a gamble. Some people can afford
>to make that gamble, and some of them might make a lot of money off of
>it. But overall, blindly accepting high-stake risks is not only
>foolhardy, it is bad business practice.
So far the rules of increasing performance have yet to dissappoint. Will
they ever? Yes, but I doubt it will be within the next few decades.
>Lurking in all of this is the trendy (since WWII) practice of Designed
>Obsolescence. Large groups of people (artists, educators, and non-first
>world citizens) have realized that obsolete technologies aren't.
This list runs on an Nexgen P90 equivalent, and is (soonish) going to be
moved to an even older (late 1980's technology) m68040 based Apollo
Workstation. My chiropractor is convinced he needs to get a top end P-II
to do simple word processing and the practice accounts. He has yet to
fully notice that he is currently doing all the same work perfectly well
with an i486-33,
However, such second generation owners don't spend much on software or
hardware. They are safely ignorable by the hardware manufacturers, and
treatable as an upgrade candidate pool for the software folks.
>The problem with Designed
>Obsolescence is that isn't sustainable; at some point a product is
>released that is of superior quality and future demand drops off.
Which is why MS and co are pushing hard to move the front to that of
software compatability, and is the reasons that standards so endanger
this. How many people "upgraded" to the latest version of Word not
because it added any features they needed, or fixed any bugs that plagued
them, but because they need file format compatability with all the others
who had upgraded for the same reason?
>To somehow tie this back to a list-relevant topic: Mike is advocating
>that product cycles should be targeted towards cutting-edge machines,
>because cutting-edge is cool? important? profitable?
Because cutting edge enables game features not possible with less
performant machines, and less features means less "gee-whiz" factor, which
is what gains reviews, word of mouth, and a larger percentage of end-user
sales.
Could you sell Pong now? Could you sell the original Donkey Kong now?
Look that they did to Frogger to sell it to the current public.
>If a product is delayed
>by six months/a year (an obvious risk when you are pretending to program
>on a machine that you don't have) doesn't that indicate there needs to be
>something more to the product than "cutting edge" design?
Flash, glitz, WOW! factor.
--
J C Lawrence Internet: claw@null.net
----------(*) Internet: coder@ibm.net
...Honourary Member of Clan McFud -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith... - Moore's Law sucks (was: 3D graphics) Alex Oren
- Version Control (was: DBs and Events) Vadim Tkachenko
- Version Control (was: DBs and Events) coder@ibm.net
- Version Control (was: DBs and Events) Vadim Tkachenko
- Version Control (was: DBs and Events) coder@ibm.net
- Version Control (was: DBs and Events) coder@ibm.net
- Version Control (was: DBs and Events) Jon A. Lambert
- Version Control (was: DBs and Events) s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
- Version Control (was: DBs and Events) Raph & Kristen Koster
- Version Control (was: DBs and Events) coder@ibm.net
- Version Control (was: DBs and Events) Felix A. Croes
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Jon Leonard
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) coder@ibm.net
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Vadim Tkachenko
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Chris Gray
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Caliban Tiresias Darklock
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) J C Lawrence
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) J C Lawrence
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Adam Wiggins
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Chris Gray
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Vadim Tkachenko
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Chris Gray
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Vadim Tkachenko
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Chris Gray
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Adam Wiggins
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Chris Gray
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) J C Lawrence
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Chris Gray
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Adam Wiggins
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Ben Greear
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Adam Wiggins
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) Jon A. Lambert
- Net protocols for MUDing (was: Moore's Law sucks) J C Lawrence
- VEIL (was: Clients) Brandon Gillespie
- LDMs (large dynamic maps) was Unique items Mike Sellers
- Describing the environment Stephen Zepp
- Describing the environment Richard Woolcock
- Back on the list Niklas Elmqvist
- Back on the list Chris Gray
- Back on the list coder@ibm.net
- Unique items The Eternal City
- Unique items coder@ibm.net
- Position sorting Adam Wiggins
- Position sorting coder@ibm.net
- Unique items coder@ibm.net
- Unique items Nathan F Yospe
- BOOK: Myer's Silverlock coder@ibm.net
- BOOK: Myer's Silverlock Chris Gray
- BOOK: Myer's Silverlock Adam Wiggins
- Dynamic Loading of Modules (was: Back on the list) Niklas Elmqvist
- Dynamic Loading of Modules (was: Back on the list) Vadim Tkachenko
- Dynamic Loading of Modules (was: Back on the list) J C Lawrence
- Dynamic Loading of Modules (was: Back on the list Jon A. Lambert
- Net protocols for MUDing s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
- Net protocols for MUDing Stephen Zepp
- Net protocols for MUDing Chris Gray
- Net protocols for MUDing Adam Wiggins
- Net protocols for MUDing J C Lawrence
- Net protocols for MUDing Shawn Halpenny
- Net protocols for MUDing J C Lawrence
- Net protocols for MUDing Chris Gray
- Dynamic Loading of Modules Niklas Elmqvist
- Senses (was: The MLI Project) s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
- bar-time (was The MLI Project) Mike Sellers
- 3D engines for MUDs (was: The MLI Project) Niklas Elmqvist
- 3D engines for MUDs (was: The MLI Project) J C Lawrence
- 3D engines for MUDs (was: The MLI Project) Michael Hohensee
- 3D engines for MUDs (was: The MLI Project) Miroslav Silovic
- 3D engines for MUDs (was: The MLI Project) Michael Hohensee
- Why not compile java into object code? Ben Greear
- Why not compile java into object code? Cynbe ru Taren
- Why not compile java into object code? Caliban Tiresias Darklock
- Why not compile java into object code? Nathan F Yospe
- Why not compile java into object code? Niklas Elmqvist
- Why not compile java into object code? Ben Greear
- Why not compile java into object code? Jon A. Lambert
- Why not compile java into object code? Travis Casey
- Why not compile java into object code? Chris Gray
- Tutorial: Comments on Hand-crafting a compiler Jon A. Lambert
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part I: Introduction Jon A. Lambert
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part II: Expression Parsing Jon A. Lambert
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part I: Introductio Chris Gray
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part I: Introductio s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part I: Introductio coder@ibm.net
- MUD Development Digest Dr. Cat
- MUD Development Digest Koster, Raph
- MUD Development Digest Mike Sellers
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part III: More Expressions Jon A. Lambert
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part IV: Interpreters Jon A. Lambert
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part V: Control Constructs Jon A. Lambert
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part VI: Boolean Expressions Jon A. Lambert
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Comments Jon A. Lambert
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part VII: Lexical Scanning Jon A. Lambert
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part VIII: A Little Philosophy Jon A. Lambert
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part IX: A Top View Jon A. Lambert
- Tutorial: Let's build a Compiler! - Part X: Introducing TINY Jon A. Lambert
- Compilers: Toy available for ftp Chris Gray