hehe,
I've already started. I agree with you that it's not a sunday afternoon
project but something in the lines of a hobby; a few hours here and then,
and it's also a great motivation to start without the limitations of other
codebases.
Mine is available at (it's under-development and not nowhere near finished)
http://code.google.com/p/tekamud/
cheers!
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:12 AM, <matthew.owen@barclays.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Tiago <tiago.matias@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I know that this question surfaces from time to time, but, what is
> > your opinion on developing text based muds these days ?
>
> > Thing is, is it worth it? Will anyone still care ? Is it a waste of time?
>
> I'd say, if you've got the time, then go for it. I found writing my own MUD
> codebase very enjoyable. It also enabled me to tackle some code scenarios
> I'd
> never hit before. It's very different beast writing a state engine for
> multiple players compared to a GUI based single user application. The end
> result was that I'd created something I was proud of, and something that
> others (for a short while) enjoyed playing. I also improved my coding
> skills
> no end because even a basic MUD engine requires 1000s of lines of code -
> it's
> not a trivial 'Sunday Afternoon Project'.
>
> Ignore all the naysayers who say that it pointless to create your own when
> codebases already exist; they are completely missing the point. By their
> logic no one would invent anything new and we'd all have one type of wheel,
> attached to one type of vehicle.
>
> I will say this tho. Before you start, think about what you did and didn't
> like about other MUDs an design accordingly. When I wrote MUD32, I used
> Shades as my model, as I spent most of my teenage years living in that MUD
> (ahhh, how I miss that blue/red viewdata page...) and I knew it well.
> However
> in all things, there is always room for improvement - for instance, I'd
> like
> to see some sort of P2P MUD Servers, where potentially each zone in the
> world
> is hosted by different servers... I don't think it's been done, and I think
> it would be interesting to see if it is workable...
>
> -Matt (Jaruzel)
>
> MUD32 is available here:
http://www.jaruzel.com/mud
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -
>
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for
> the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system
> and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or
> its attachments.
>
> Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free.
> The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from
> unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by
> any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this
> e-mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business
> reasons.
>
> Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that
> does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the
> sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.
>
> Barclays Bank PLC.Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167).
> Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.
>
> Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority.
>