June 1998

• Playerkilling website Koster, Raph
• • Playerkilling website John Bertoglio
  • • Playerkilling website Koster, Raph
    • Playerkilling website J C Lawrence
  • Playerkilling website J C Lawrence
• (fwd) Multiple currencies J C Lawrence
• • (fwd) Multiple currencies Matt Chatterley
• Exploring the guild phenomena J C Lawrence
• Re:(fwd) Multiple currencies Michael.Willey@abnamro.com
• • Re:(fwd) Multiple currencies J C Lawrence
  • • Re:(fwd) Multiple currencies Michael.Willey@abnamro.com
    • • Re:(fwd) Multiple currencies Mike Sellers
      • • Re:(fwd) Multiple currencies J C Lawrence
        • • Re:(fwd) Multiple currencies Michael.Willey@abnamro.com
      • Re:(fwd) Multiple currencies Richard Woolcock
      • Re:(fwd) Multiple currencies J C Lawrence
      • • Re:(fwd) Multiple currencies T. Alexander Popiel
        • • Re:(fwd) Multiple currencies J C Lawrence
• Administrative Meddling Jon A. Lambert
• • Administrative Meddling Mike Sellers
  • • Administrative Meddling Matthew R. Sheahan
    • • Administrative Meddling Mike Sellers
    • Administrative Meddling Jon A. Lambert
    • • Administrative Meddling Mike Sellers
      • • Administrative Meddling Jon A. Lambert
    • Administrative Meddling J C Lawrence
  • Administrative Meddling J C Lawrence
• OT: ICQ hacks and exploits J C Lawrence
• • OT: ICQ hacks and exploits Mike Sellers
  • • OT: ICQ hacks and exploits J C Lawrence
• META: membership list J C Lawrence
• META: Archives. Ling
• • META: Archives. Koster, Raph
• Levelless MUDs Holly Sommer
• • Levelless MUDs Jon Leonard
  • Levelless MUDs Adam Wiggins
  • • Levelless MUDs John Bertoglio
    • • Levelless MUDs Koster, Raph
      • • Levelless MUDs J C Lawrence
      • Levelless MUDs Adam Wiggins
      • • Levelless MUDs Matt Chatterley
    • Levelless MUDs J C Lawrence
    • • Levelless MUDs Holly Sommer
      • • Levelless MUDs J C Lawrence
        • • Levelless MUDs Ben Greear
          • • Levelless MUDs Travis S. Casey
            • • Levelless MUDs Ling
              • • Levelless MUDs Adam Wiggins
      • Levelless MUDs Travis S. Casey
      • Levelless MUDs Adam Wiggins
  • Levelless MUDs Matt Chatterley
  • • Levelless MUDs Holly Sommer
    • • Levelless MUDs Adam Wiggins
        On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Holly Sommer wrote:
        > On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, Matt Chatterley wrote:
        > > I suppose the key things to look at are *exactly* what is influenced by
        > > levels, and how else you might handle it. Swap in other things which make
        > > more 'sense' (for instance, apply a strength stat to damage instead of
        > > level, and so forth).
        >
        > After going over it with some who have played in this environment, and
        > others who have written code for it, the following things have been
        > highlighted:
        >
        > o We'll have to move from a %based skill proficiency system, to one
        > which has no artificial ceiling (100% is max... hey, is anyone
        > perfect at ANYTHING?) where you have skill bonuses and penalties
        > (+8 on pick lock) and that each skill has a counterskill (working
        > on a -5 difficulty lock, for a net effectiveness of +3) while
        > throwing in some luck (so roll a 3d6 and get <= net effectiveness,
        > where 18 is always a fail, and 3 is always a win)
        
        Yup, it's all relative. I generally like to set up everything on a rough
        scale of 0 to 99, where 0 means you've never heard of it, and 99 is
        practically inattainable. (Your skill max is actually dependant on a lot
        of stuff; big dumb brutes will have trouble getting most of their skills
        over 40.) This makes it easy to do comparissons, since it's just your
        skill vs. your opponent's skill. (Ie, sword skill vs parry skill) An
        inanimate object can still be considered your "opponent" - if it's a lock
        on a door, you compare your lockpicking skill (0 to 99) against the
        difficulty of the lock (0 to 99).
        
        > o Remove the level restrictions on eq. This is what the builders
        > objected to the most (see below). I am of the mindset that levels
        > could still be left in place for deciding relative "power" of the
        > eq (and the goodies/bonuses/penalties/etc. which go along with
        > the more desirable eq), but that if player characters no longer have
        > player levels, then there is no level check for using eq: you
        > found it, you can use it.
        
        There are lots of fun things you can do to achieve a similar effect. The
        first diku I played on had no level limits, but it did have a few
        interesting things:
        
        - Ego items. Based on some strange formula (I think it was something like
        (5 * char_level) + char_hitpoints) the item would decide that you weren't
        'good enough' for it and would attempt to wretch itself out of your hands.
        This was no big deal if you were high level + high hitpoints, but if you
        were right on the line it meant you frequently ran into problems of your
        sword throwing itself out of your hand in the middle of a fight...
        - 'Cursed' items. The One Ring of Power was found in the stanard place
        (Keeper of the Ring in the Shire). Anyone above about 20th level (on a 50
        level scale) could kill him by themselves without much difficulty.
        However...having the One Ring in your posession meant that the nine
        ringwraiths that inhabitted the mud would constantly be chasing you down.
        These were nasty creatures that hit hard, had a good amount of hit points,
        and "touched you with ghostly hands" or something once a round to drain
        you a character level. Thus keeping the Ring around was a full-time job
        in and of itself. Most folks that tried it elected to give it up, despite
        being the best ring for spellcasters in the game. Usually they got it,
        said 'Al-RIGHT!', and fifteen minutes later they were down five or six
        levels and had junked the ring.
        - PK. This is the best one, IMO. Newbies wearing good gear on Arctic get
        killed very quickly. This means that oldbies, when creating a new
        character, either carefully hide their equipment, or just don't give
        anything good to their new char. Of course, it also means that giving a
        good item to a true newbie is about the same as signing their
        death-warrant.
        
        > o Other means of identifying the experienced bravados from the
        > well-equipped newbie. Obviously, this is in the skill bonuses/penalties
        > realm. You can outfit Bubba the Well-Travelled Adventurer and
        > Boffo the Brand New Player the same, but Bubba knows the game better,
        > and has spent time LEARNING things, which will be to his advantage,
        > should he and Boffo ever be in the arena together against one another.
        
        And as always, I'm a strong proponent of the swordmaster with a steel
        rapier being able to best the newbie wielding Deathwreaker, Mighty Mace of
        Power practically every time.
        
        > Essentially, levels are being used for two things:
        > 1. Determining when you can learn a skill
        > 2. Determining when you can use eq
        >
        > We have considered using skilltrees - sets of prerequisites - for skills.
        > This removes the artificialness of "sorry, you can't learn dodge, it's a
        > level 20 skill in THIS game, and you're only level 3), and of using
        > rune-based magic, so that you don't have situations where "fireball is
        > just a level 30 version of magic missile).
        
        You can (once again) get mechanics in the game which are much less
        discrete but still achieve the same effect as limiting skills based on
        levels. For instance, the only person who can teach you the deadly
        Adder's Touch attack is the guru on top of Mt. Tall. He'll only agree to
        teach you if you can engage him in combat, naked and unarmed, and remain
        standing for more than thirty seconds.
        
        > It would also be easy and popular with players to promote our eq as
        > "having no level restrictions! You find it, you use it!"
        
        Plenty of muds do this. I don't see it as a problem, as long as you limit
        your equipment properly. The place it causes problems is when there is a
        surplus of good stuff, such that high-levelers kill a nasty critter and
        get a full set of nice gear, but have no use for it and so give it to a
        newbie. If you balance things right, there should always be a slight
        under-suply of good gear for all the high-level players on the mud, such
        that very little trickles down to newbies. AnotherMUD achieved this quite
        well; despite having NO object limits (you could get an infinite number of
        any given object, potentially), the best objects managed to keep their
        value for the entire several-year span of the mud's existence.
        
        Another option that seems to work well is item decay. I'm not so fond of
        this, but I've seen it work quite effectively. Any given 'good' item
        decays after so many game ticks. Thus if a newbie happens onto a good
        item somehow, they only have it for a while and then it goes away. If a
        high level person has it, it decays and then they just say, "Whoops, my
        Glowing Headband of Doom just decayed, let's go grab me another"
        
        And of course, the ubiquios rent. This doesn't stop high-levelers from
        giving good items to their newbies (since they just give them a pile of
        money, too) but it does keep a newbie who happened onto a high-lever's
        corpse (or whatever) from keeping everything they find - they just can't
        afford it.
        
        > For some reason, however, if you use precise language and say "levels are
        > being removed," those who are accustomed to them absolutely flip out.
        > It's very very strange. I guess people assume that eq which would have
        > been known as "level 50 eq" will just be lying around the newbie area,
        > and will seriously unbalance the game. If that IS the case, it's not so
        > much a problem of system design, as it is of poor AREA (builder) design.
        
        That's it. Levels just make things so much easier on builders, although
        someone like me only finds them restricting.
        
        > If it's anything at all like the staff members I've merely MENTIONED this
        > to, as a possible *consideration* - with great bouts of gnashing of
        > teeth, and with feelings of betrayal. And that's without even speculating
        > aloud, what a change like removing levels would entail. Bleah.
        
        People do this about any major change. I've seen it a million times: a
        popular mud makes a big change which is for the better in the long run but
        which player's don't take to at the moment. The mud population drops
        sharply for a few weeks, but then picks up again and actually increases
        since the mud is better now. And new folks come on, unaware that things
        were ever any other way...
        
        > We decided it best to just go ahead and start work on an experimental
        > server, and leave everyone else out of it while we work on it. Too much
        > strife, and too many cooks with their fingers in the pot, if we involve
        > player and builder feedback during the construction phase. It'll be a
        > coder's endeavor, initially.
        
        This is always a good idea. Most muds I've been involved with at an admin
        level have two versions running at any given time, the regular game port,
        and the builder's port, which is limited to members of the admin only.
        
        Adam
      • Levelless MUDs Benjamin D. Wiechel
      • Levelless MUDs Jon A. Lambert
      • Levelless MUDs Matt Chatterley
  • Levelless MUDs jacob langthorn
  • • Levelless MUDs Holly Sommer
    • • Levelless MUDs Nathan F Yospe
      • Levelless MUDs Koster, Raph
      • • Levelless MUDs Richard Woolcock
      • Levelless MUDs Katrina McClelan
      • Levelless MUDs Adam Wiggins
      • • Levelless MUDs Adam Wiggins
        • Levelless MUDs D. B. Brown
      • Levelless MUDs Matt Chatterley
  • Levelless MUDs Larry Homer
  • • Levelless MUDs Richard Woolcock
• META: Erroneous bounce messages. J C Lawrence
• The lessons of Habitat's Dr Death repeated? J C Lawrence
• • The lessons of Habitat's Dr Death repeated? Jon A. Lambert
• In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Elis Pomales
• • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Koster, Raph
  • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Greg Munt
  • • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Matt Chatterley
    • • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. J C Lawrence
      • • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Jo Dillon
        • • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Jon A. Lambert
          • • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Jo Dillon
  • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Bruce Mitchener
  • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Robert Woods
  • • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Adam Wiggins
    • • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Holly Sommer
      • • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Richard Woolcock
        • • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Michael.Willey@abnamro.com
          • • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Jo Dillon
  • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Matt Chatterley
  • In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. J C Lawrence
• MUDZilla -- commercial server base J C Lawrence
• • MUDZilla -- commercial server base John Bertoglio
  • • MUDZilla -- commercial server base J C Lawrence
• Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Greg Munt
• • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Mike Sellers
  • • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? J C Lawrence
  • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Richard Woolcock
  • • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Mike Sellers
    • • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Richard Woolcock
      • • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Greg Munt
        • • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Holly Sommer
          • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Richard Woolcock
          • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Andrew C.M. McClintock
          • • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Niklas Elmqvist
            • • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? J C Lawrence
              • • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Adam Wiggins
                • • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? J C Lawrence
                  • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? francois@toubol.com
          • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? J C Lawrence
  • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Chris Gray
  • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? J C Lawrence
  • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? J C Lawrence
  • • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Nathan F Yospe
    • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Travis S. Casey
    • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? T. Alexander Popiel
    • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Bruce Mitchener
  • Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mud development? Chris Gray
• Mud websites Greg Munt
• • Mud websites Robert Woods
  • • Mud websites Koster, Raph
    • Mud websites Matt Chatterley
  • Mud websites Koster, Raph
  • • Mud websites J C Lawrence
    • • Mud websites John Bertoglio
      • • Mud websites Adam Wiggins
  • Mud websites Holly Sommer
  • • Mud websites Matt Chatterley
  • Mud websites Travis S. Casey
  • • Mud websites Matt Chatterley
    • • Mud websites Travis S. Casey
  • Mud websites Vadim Tkachenko
  • mud websites Scatter
  • • mud websites Oliver Jowett
    • • mud websites Scatter
      • • mud websites Oliver Jowett
        • mud websites J C Lawrence
        • • mud websites Scatter
    • mud websites J C Lawrence
    • • mud websites Scatter
  • Mud websites Chris Gray
  • • Mud websites J C Lawrence
  • Mud websites Matt Chatterley
  • Mud websites J C Lawrence
  • Mud websites Chris Gray
  • • Mud websites Matt Chatterley
  • Mud websites Chris Gray
• LDAP server as ... Vadim Tkachenko
• • LDAP server as ... J C Lawrence
• Nested Coordinate spaces. Elis Pomales
• • Nested Coordinate spaces. J C Lawrence
  • • Nested Coordinate spaces. Nathan F Yospe
    • • Nested Coordinate spaces. Elis Pomales
      • • Nested Coordinate spaces. Michael Hohensee
        • Nested Coordinate spaces. J C Lawrence
• Telepathy Rules Lawrence W. Homer
• Off topic! But please help Marian Griffith
• • Off topic! But please help John Bertoglio
  • • Off topic! But please help Jon A. Lambert
    • • Off topic! But please help John Bertoglio
  • Off topic! But please help Holly Sommer
• META: Quoting, again. J C Lawrence
• Re:Telepathy Rules Michael.Willey@abnamro.com
• • Re:Telepathy Rules Matt Chatterley
• Databases: was skill system jacob langthorn
• • Databases: was skill system Mike Sellers
  • • Databases: was skill system John Bertoglio
    • Databases: was skill system J C Lawrence
  • Databases: was skill system T. Alexander Popiel
  • • Databases: was skill system s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
    • • Databases: was skill system J C Lawrence
      • • Databases: was skill system s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
        • • Databases: was skill system J C Lawrence
        • Databases: was skill system John Bertoglio
      • Databases: was skill system Jon A. Lambert
      • • Databases: was skill system Adam J. Thornton
        • • Databases: was skill system Jon A. Lambert
          • • Databases: was skill system J C Lawrence
            • • Databases: was skill system Jon A. Lambert
              • • Databases: was skill system J C Lawrence
                • • Databases: was skill system Jon A. Lambert
                  • • Databases: was skill system J C Lawrence
        • Databases: was skill system s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
        • • Databases: was skill system jacob langthorn
          • Databases: was skill system ##Make Nylander
          • Databases: was skill system Jon A. Lambert
          • Databases: was skill system J C Lawrence
          • • Databases: was skill system s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
        • Databases: was skill system J C Lawrence
      • Databases: was skill system J C Lawrence
      • • Databases: was skill system s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
        • • Databases: was skill system J C Lawrence
    • Databases: was skill system J C Lawrence
    • • Databases: was skill system T. Alexander Popiel
• Mud-time vs real-time (was skill system) Mike Sellers
• • Mud-time vs real-time (was skill system) T. Alexander Popiel
  • Mud-time vs real-time (was skill system) Richard Woolcock
  • • Mud-time vs real-time (was skill system) Katrina McClelan
• darkness/visibility Oliver Jowett
• • darkness/visibility Chris Gray
  • • darkness/visibility Michael.Willey@abnamro.com
    • • darkness/visibility Travis S. Casey
      • darkness/visibility Dr. Cat
    • darkness/visibility Benjamin D. Wiechel
    • • darkness/visibility Andrew C.M. McClintock
    • darkness/visibility Adam Wiggins
    • • darkness/visibility oliver@jowett.manawatu.planet.co.nz
      • darkness/visibility Richard Woolcock
      • • darkness/visibility T. Alexander Popiel
    • darkness/visibility J C Lawrence
  • darkness/visibility Chris Gray
  • • darkness/visibility Michael.Willey@abnamro.com
    • darkness/visibility Adam Wiggins
    • darkness/visibility Vadim Tkachenko
  • darkness/visibility Holly Sommer
  • • darkness/visibility Benjamin D. Wiechel
    • darkness/visibility Richard Woolcock
  • darkness/visibility Chris Gray
  • • darkness/visibility Ben Greear
    • • darkness/visibility Katrina McClelan
  • darkness/visibility J C Lawrence
  • darkness/visibility Chris Gray
  • • darkness/visibility J C Lawrence
    • • darkness/visibility Travis S. Casey
      • • darkness/visibility J C Lawrence
        • • darkness/visibility Travis S. Casey
          • • darkness/visibility J C Lawrence
            • • darkness/visibility Travis S. Casey
  • darkness/visibility Chris Gray
• Off topic! ... J C Lawrence
• Mailing List Archives Elis Pomales
• • Mailing List Archives J C Lawrence
• [Fwd: Temporality and user actions in MUDs] Richard Woolcock
• PC 99 standard In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Mike Sellers
• • PC 99 standard In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Jo Dillon
  • • PC 99 standard In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Richard Woolcock
    • • PC 99 standard In game bulletin boards vs. Web based. Adam Wiggins
• Away on a trip Bryce
• META: The web is a live again! J C Lawrence
• Away on a trip Bryce
• Technical C/C++ coding question Ben Greear
• • Technical C/C++ coding question Katrina McClelan
  • • Technical C/C++ coding question J C Lawrence
    • • Technical C/C++ coding question Jon Leonard
      • • Technical C/C++ coding question Katrina McClelan
        • • Technical C/C++ coding question Jon Leonard
          • • Technical C/C++ coding question Katrina McClelan
            • Technical C/C++ coding question Ben Greear
            • Technical C/C++ coding question Shawn Halpenny
            • • Technical C/C++ coding question Shawn Halpenny
              • Technical C/C++ coding question J C Lawrence
  • Technical C/C++ coding question Finn Arne Gangstad
• Analysis and specification - the dirty words of mu Jon A. Lambert
• stuff that makes me leave (was In game bulletin...) Dan Shiovitz
• • stuff that makes me leave (was In game bulletin...) Richard Woolcock
  • • stuff that makes me leave (was In game bulletin...) Ben Greear
    • • stuff that makes me leave (was In game bulletin...) Katrina McClelan
      • • stuff that makes me leave (was In game bulletin...) Richard Woolcock
        • • stuff that makes me leave (was In game bulletin...) Katrina McClelan
          • • stuff that makes me leave (was In game bulletin...) J C Lawrence
            • • stuff that makes me leave (was In game bulletin...) Katrina McClelan
• stuff that makes me leave Richard Woolcock
• • stuff that makes me leave Mike Sellers
  • stuff that makes me leave Robert Woods
  • stuff that makes me leave Matt Chatterley
• (fwd) Temporality and user actions in MUDs J C Lawrence
• Analysis and specification Shawn Halpenny
• OT: Announcement s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
• • OT: Announcement Nathan F Yospe
  • OT: Announcement Chris Gray
  • • OT: Announcement s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
  • OT: Announcement Chris Gray
  • • OT: Announcement s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
• Analysis and specification Shawn Halpenny
• • Analysis and specification Ben Greear
• The great crusade.... J C Lawrence
• • The great crusade.... Koster, Raph
  • • The great crusade.... Jon A. Lambert
    • The great crusade.... J C Lawrence
    • • The great crusade.... Mike Sellers
    • The great crusade.... brandon
    • • The great crusade.... Mike Sellers
      • • The great crusade.... J C Lawrence
  • The great crusade.... Koster, Raph
  • • The great crusade.... S. Patrick Gallaty
    • • The great crusade.... J C Lawrence
  • The great crusade.... J C Lawrence
• User Input Parser, was darkness/visibility Richard Woolcock
• what's fun? Mike Sellers
• • what's fun? J C Lawrence
  • what's fun? Richard Bartle
  • • what's fun? J C Lawrence
  • what's fun? Richard Bartle
• Is worse better? J C Lawrence
• • Is worse better? Katrina McClelan
  • • Is worse better? Jon A. Lambert
    • • Is worse better? Ben Greear
      • • Is worse better? Katrina McClelan
        • Is worse better? Vadim Tkachenko
• Mozilla: unity of interface J C Lawrence
• • Mozilla: unity of interface John Bertoglio
• OT:Is worse better? Nathan F Yospe
• • OT:Is worse better? Jon A. Lambert
• [Fwd: Warfare on retromud.org 3000] Richard Woolcock
• • [Fwd: Warfare on retromud.org 3000] Chris Gray
• Analysis and specification - the dirty words o Jon A. Lambert
• • Analysis and specification - the dirty words o s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
• ADMIN: OS Wars J C Lawrence
• MySQL scalability J C Lawrence
• Prescience Rules? [Previously submitted under wrong thread :( ] Larry Homer
• • Prescience Rules? [Previously submitted under wrong thread :( ] Dan Shiovitz
  • • Prescience Rules? [Previously submitted under wrong thread :( ] Richard Woolcock
    • • Prescience Rules? [Previously submitted under wrong thread :( ] Dan Shiovitz
      • • Prescience Rules? [Previously submitted under wrong thread :( ] Adam Wiggins
• stuff that makes me leave (was In game bulleti Matt Chatterley
• Prescience Rules? Joel Kelso
• OT: Ack! Adam Wiggins
• Natural Language Parsing (Was: darkness/visibility) s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
• • Natural Language Parsing (Was: darkness/visibility) Adam J. Thornton
• bytecode results Chris Gray
• Prescience Rules? Richard Woolcock
• • Prescience Rules? Vadim Tkachenko
  • • Prescience Rules? Richard Woolcock
    • • Prescience Rules? Nathan F Yospe
• Biting the hand that feeds you J C Lawrence
• RI Adventure Contest (fwd) Holly Sommer
• WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
• • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Dan Shiovitz
  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Mike Sellers
      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun John Bertoglio
        • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Mike Sellers
          • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
            • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Maddy
              • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
                  • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Dr. Cat
                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Mike Sellers
                        • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                          • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Mike Sellers
                            • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                            • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                            • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Mike Sellers
                              • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Mike Sellers
                                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                                • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Adam Wiggins
                                    • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Damion Schubert
                                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Caliban Tiresias Darklock
                                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                                        • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Damion Schubert
                                          • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                          • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Caliban Tiresias Darklock
                                      • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Caliban Tiresias Darklock
                                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                      • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Damion Schubert
                                  • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Dr. Cat
                                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun S. Patrick Gallaty
                                    • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Spangler, Jason
                                • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Joel Kelso
                              • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                              • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Dr. Cat
                                • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                                • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
                                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Holly Sommer
                                      • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Maddy
                                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                                        • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Dr. Cat
                                          • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Caliban Tiresias Darklock
                                            • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                                            • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                                          • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Damion Schubert
                                    • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Mike Sellers
                                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                        • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Damion Schubert
                                        • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Caliban Tiresias Darklock
                                          • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                                          • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                                            • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Damion Schubert
                                              • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                                              • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                              • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Damion Schubert
                                            • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Caliban Tiresias Darklock
                                  • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Dr. Cat
                                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Caliban Tiresias Darklock
                                • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
                                • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
                                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Matthew R. Sheahan
                                        • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Travis S. Casey
                                        • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                                        • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Travis Casey
                                      • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
                                        • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Robert Woods
                                          • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
                                          • WIRED: Kilers have more fun s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
                                          • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
                            • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
                            • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun S. Patrick Gallaty
                              • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
                                • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Matthew R. Sheahan
                                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun CJones@aagis.com
                                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Nathan F Yospe
                                    • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
                                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
                                    • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Caliban Tiresias Darklock
                                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun quzah
                                  • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Till Eulenspiegel
                                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
                                    • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                              • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Mike Sellers
                          • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Nathan F Yospe
                          • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                          • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Mike Sellers
                            • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                        • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                        • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Dr. Cat
                          • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Joel Kelso
                            • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                            • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Matt Chatterley
                              • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                        • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                  • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Maddy
                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Dan Shiovitz
                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                        • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Richard Woolcock
                          • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                            • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                            • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Matt Chatterley
                            • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Damion Schubert
                              • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Adam Wiggins
                      • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Maddy
                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Matt Chatterley
              • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Matt Chatterley
              • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun CJones@aagis.com
                • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun S. Patrick Gallaty
                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Adam Wiggins
                      • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun S. Patrick Gallaty
                • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Marian Griffith
                • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun S. Patrick Gallaty
                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Michael.Willey@abnamro.com
                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun S. Patrick Gallaty
                      • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Michael.Willey@abnamro.com
                • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Caliban Tiresias Darklock
                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Koster, Raph
                    • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Damion Schubert
                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Caliban Tiresias Darklock
                  • WIRED: Kilers have more fun s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
                  • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Michael.Willey@abnamro.com
                    • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Damion Schubert
                  • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Scatter
            • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
          • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
          • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Richard Woolcock
            • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
              • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Richard Woolcock
                • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Ling
                  • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
                • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Matt Chatterley
              • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Matt Chatterley
              • • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Damion Schubert
    • WIRED: Kilers have more fun J C Lawrence
  • WIRED: Kilers have more fun Jon A. Lambert
• WIRED: One brave soul's UO diary. J C Lawrence
• Tron meets MUD meets the arcades. Detonation expected. J C Lawrence
• WWW/INN/news systems (Was: mud websites) Petri Virkkula
• Prescience Rules? Scatter
• Suggested theme, was WIRED: Kilers have more fun Richard Woolcock
• • Suggested theme, was WIRED: Kilers have more fun Dan Shiovitz
• mud-related event: Dr. K... Brandon J. Rickman
• Suggested theme, was WIRED: Kilers have more fun Chris Gray
• Multi-Server games Ben Greear
• • Multi-Server games Jo Dillon
  • • Multi-Server games MH
    • • Multi-Server games Jo Dillon
      • • Multi-Server games MH
        • Multi-Server games J C Lawrence
      • Multi-Server games Vadim Tkachenko
      • • Multi-Server games Ben Greear
        • • Multi-Server games Vadim Tkachenko
          • • Multi-Server games Koster, Raph
• ScryMUD: Source release, version 1.4 Ben Greear
• (fwd) Dantom's Universal Network Game (DUNG) Nathan Fenenga Yospe
• I/O Event Handling Under Linux by Richard Gooch J C Lawrence
• • I/O Event Handling Under Linux by Richard Gooch s001gmu@nova.wright.edu
• Thread implementations... J C Lawrence
• Suggested theme Richard Woolcock
• Suggested theme Richard Woolcock
• Suggested theme Chris Gray
• Analysis and specification - the dirty words o J C Lawrence
• • Analysis and specification - the dirty words o Jon A. Lambert
• Quotes from Marcus Ranum J C Lawrence
• • Quotes from Marcus Ranum Nathan F Yospe
  • Quotes from Marcus Ranum Chris Gray
• WIRED: Kilers have more fun Chris Gray
• the why of online worlds Mike Sellers
• • the why of online worlds Ben Greear
• A variation on persistent store techniques with notes on distributed processing support J C Lawrence
• You think users won't number crunch and statistise your MUD? J C Lawrence
• • You think users won't number crunch and statistise your MUD? Dr. Cat
  • You think users won't number crunch and statistise your MUD? Ling
  • You think users won't number crunch and statistise your MUD? Travis S. Casey
  • • You think users won't number crunch and statistise your MUD? J C Lawrence
    • • You think users won't number crunch and statistise your MUD? Travis S. Casey
      • • You think users won't number crunch and statistise your MUD? Vadim Tkachenko
        • • You think users won't number crunch and statistise your MUD? Travis Casey
  • You think users won't number crunch and statistise your MUD? Chris Gray
• RP definitional structure J C Lawrence
• Combat intelligence J C Lawrence
• • Combat intelligence J C Lawrence
  • Combat intelligence Ling
  • • Combat intelligence Niklas Elmqvist
• the why of online worlds. cat
• Rules of the game: How Long Till You Die J C Lawrence
• Rules of the Game: You don't always live twice Or... Take my life, Please J C Lawrence
• roleplaying farmers? Mike L Kesl
• • roleplaying farmers? J C Lawrence
• Sugarscape: A-Life variation with economic interests J C Lawrence
• Embedded languages was Databases: was skill system Chris Gray
• Embedded languages was Databases: was skill system Vadim Tkachenko